Explanation:

- Rowland vs. Divall: This case is focused on the implied condition as to the title of goods. It involved the sale of a car, which the seller did not actually own, leading to a breach of the implied condition of title in the sale of goods.

- Nichol vs. Crodis: This case deals with the sale of goods by description, emphasizing that goods must correspond to the description.

- Grant vs. Australian Knitting Mills: This case relates to the implied condition of fitness for purpose in the sale of goods and how products should meet intended purposes.

- David Jones Ltd. vs. Willes: This case is concerned with implied conditions related to the sale of goods and their corresponding descriptions or qualities.