send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The Plaintiff on the oral request of an officer of the State of Bihar made certain constructions which were voluntarily enjoyed by the State. The State, however, refused payment on the ground that there was no valid contract in accordance with law. Which of the following is true?
The plaintiff is entitled to nominal damages
The plaintiff is not entitled to payment as the contract was made orally and not in accordance with law
The Plaintiff is entitled to exemplary damages
None of the above
Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act – 70. Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act. Where a person lawfully does anything for another person, or delivers anything to him, not intending to do so gratuitously, and such another person enjoys the benefit thereof, the letter is bound to make compensation to the former in respect of, or to restore, the thing so done or delivered. In keeping with above, the plaintiff is entitled to nominal damages
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses