send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
“Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated. As against this, when delay is condoned, the highest that can happen is that cause would be decided on merits after hearing the parties”. This has been held in
Collector, Land Acquisition v. Katiji (AIR 1987 SC 1353)
G. Ramegowda v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Ajay Gupta v. Raju Rajendra Singh Yadav 2016(3) JBCJ 187 (SC)
West Bengal v. W.B. Judicial Service Association, 1990 (2) Cal. L.J. 73
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses