send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The case of Hadley v. Baxendale, deals with __________.
Anticipatory breach of contract
Quantum of damages
Supervening impossibility
Quasi-contract
- Option 1: Anticipatory breach of contract
- Refers to a situation where one party indicates they won't perform their obligation before the performance is due.
- Option 2: Quantum of damages
- Correct Answer: Hadley v. Baxendale deals with the measure and scope of damages. It set a precedent for determining foreseeable and recoverable damages in contract breaches.
- Option 3: Supervening impossibility
- Occurs when an unforeseen event interrupts the ability of parties to execute the contract.
- Option 4: Quasi-contract
- Not a traditional contract, but a legal obligation imposed to prevent unjust enrichment.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses