send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
1 and 2 only
1 and 3 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
- Statement 1: The office must be public and created by a statute or the Constitution itself. This is required to file a writ of quo warranto. The writ is meant to challenge an individual's right to hold a public office.
- Statement 2: The office must be a substantive one, not merely an employment position at the will of another. This ensures that the position has legal backing and public responsibilities.
- Statement 3: There should be a violation of the Constitution or a statutory document when appointing a person to that office. This is crucial for questioning the legitimacy of the appointment.
- Correct Answer: Option 4: 1, 2, and 3.
.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses