send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which of the following is not true about Relevancy and Admissibility of evidence under Indian Evidence Act?
Relevancy and admissibility are co-extensive and interchangeable terms.
Relevant means that which is logical probative while admissibility is not based on logic but on law and strict rules.
In the Indian Evidence Act, the question of relevancy has been dealt with under sections 6 to 55 and that of admissibility from section 56 onwards.
The facts that are allowed to be proved are called relevant facts while the admissibility is the means and the method of proving the relevant facts.
The Supreme Court in Ram Bihari Yadav vs. State of Bihar7, has observed that more often the expressions 'relevancy and admissibility' are used as synonyms but their legal implications are distinct and different from for more often than not facts which are relevant are not admissible; so also facts which are admissible may not be relevant,
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses