Which of the following is true ........

Specific Relief Act (SRA) 1963 Recovering Possession of Property

Which of the following is true?

Under section 6 of Specific Relief Act, even an owner can be made a defendant by a trespasser if the owner has dispossessed a trespasser who was in settled possession

the burden of proof is strictly on the plaintiff to prove settled possession and dispossession

neither the plaintiff nor the defendant can raise the issue of title

all of the above

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Recovering Possession of Property

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

Section 6 of Specific Relief Act –
6. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property.—(1) If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person through whom he has been in possession or any person] claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit. (2) No suit under this section shall be brought— (a) after the expiry of six months from the date of dispossession; or (b) against the Government. (3) No appeal shall lie from any order or decree passed in any suit instituted under this section, nor shall any review of any such order or decree be allowed. (4) Nothing in this section shall bar any person from suing to establish his title to such property and to recover possession thereof.