send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
“Even if the sufficient cause has been shown a party is not entitled to the condonation of delay in question as a matter of right. The proof of a sufficient cause is a condition precedent for the exercise of the discretionary jurisdiction vested in the court by section 5. This aspect of the matter naturally introduces the consideration of all facts and it is at this stage the diligence of the party of its bona fides may fall for consideration…This was held in the case of
National Insurance company v. SmtRuniyaBinha, 2008(3)JCR456(Jhr)
Special Tehisldar, Land Acquisition Kerala v. K.V. Aiyusuma, 1996(10) SCC 634
PundikJalamPatil v. Executive Engineer Jalgaon medium project, 2009(1) JLJR 76 SC
Ramlal and others v. Rewa Coalfields Ltd. [ AIR 1962 SC 361]
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses