send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
X knows that Y is suffering from a disease in his head and also knows that if a blow is given to Y on his head it is likely to cause his death, X give a first blown to Y on his head. Y died. X is:
Guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder
Guilty of murder
Guilty of causing hurt
Guilty of no offence As in ordinary circumstances that blow is not sufficient to cause death of a person of normal health.
- In such cases, the law looks at both the act and intention/knowledge of the accused.
- Here, X knows Y has a disease and a blow to the head could be fatal for Y, even if it wouldn’t normally kill a healthy person.
- Indian Penal Code, Section 299-300: When the accused knows his act is likely to cause death (even if not generally sufficient to cause death of healthy person), he is guilty of “culpable homicide”, not “murder”, unless the act is done with intention to kill or with knowledge the act will most probably cause death.
- Murder is only when there is clear intention or high probability of causing death to any person, regardless of their health condition.
- Since in ordinary circumstances the blow is not sufficient to cause death, X is guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, because he had knowledge of Y’s special condition.
Option 1: Guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Correct Answer)
Option 2: Guilty of murder – Incorrect, as intent for murder for a person of average health is missing.
Option 3: Guilty of causing hurt – Incorrect, as death resulted.
Option 4: Guilty of no offence – Incorrect, as death was caused by X’s act.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses