send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A customer came to a shop. He was carrying cheques with him & knew that they were stolen. He spoke to the shop assistant who persuaded the shop manager to sell the goods on the strength of the cheques. In this case -
The customer is to be held liable for offence of receiving stolen property
The shop manager is to be held liable for offence of cheating
The shop assistant is to be held liable for offence of dishonest misappropriation of property
None of the above
A customer came to a shop. He was carrying cheques with him & knew that they were stolen. He spoke to the shop assistant who persuaded the shop manager to sell the goods on the strength of the cheques. In this case, the shop assistant is to be held liable for offence of dishonest misappropriation of property {DPP vs. Gomez (1992) 3 WLR 1067 (HL)}
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses