send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Section 21 of CPC cures:
want of subject-matter jurisdiction
want of pecuniary jurisdiction
want of territorial jurisdiction
both (b) and (c).
Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) deals with objection to jurisdiction. Here's a breakdown of the options:
- Option 1: Want of subject-matter jurisdiction
- Typically, objections based on subject-matter jurisdiction can be raised at any stage.
- Option 2: Want of pecuniary jurisdiction
- Addresses jurisdiction based on monetary limits. If not challenged at the earliest opportunity, defects are generally deemed cured.
- Option 3: Want of territorial jurisdiction
- Concerns the geographic area of jurisdiction. Like pecuniary jurisdiction, failure to object early can lead to the waiver of this defect.
- Option 4: Both (b) and (c)
- Ensures that only pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction issues can be cured if not raised timely.
Correct Answer: Option 4 - both (b) and (c).
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses