send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
There is no right of private defence against an act done, by any person under the direction of a public servant but is subjected to fulfilment of certain condition like
the act must be done in good faith.
the direction was not strictly justifiable by law.
The directed act has not been generated reasonable apprehension of death.
All of the above.
- Option 1: The act must be done in good faith. This means the person believed they were doing the right thing based on the information available.
- Option 2: The direction was not strictly justifiable by law. This implies that the order given wasn’t entirely legal, but was followed nonetheless.
- Option 3: The directed act has not generated reasonable apprehension of death. This indicates the action did not make someone fear for their life.
- Option 4: All of the above. This means all the conditions mentioned apply when there's no right of private defense against an act done under a public servant's direction.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses