send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
A is arrested by 'police and accused of murder of B. During investigation, A voluntarily agrees to undergo narco analysis and therein he confesses to have murdered B.
The confession, is relevant and can be sole basis of conviction
The confession is irrelevant.
The confession is relevant but requires corroboration
Only that much of A's statement can be used as leads to discovery of a fact.
None of the above
In Selvi v. State of Karnataka, the Supreme Court rejected the supposed utility, reliability and validity of narcoanalysis and other tests as methods 61 criminal investigation. It violated individual's right to privacy , and amounted to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. However, any information or material that is subsequently discovered with the help of voluntary administered test results can be admitted, in accordance with Section 27 of the Evidence Act.
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses