send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
n which of the following cases the Privy Council made a distinction between 'common intention' and 'similar intention'?
Bannu Mal v. Emperor
Mehaboob Shah v. King Emperor
Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor
Srinivas Barolia v. Emperor
o constitute common intention it is necessary that the intention of each be known to all the others and be shared by them, whereas this is not so in the case of same or similar intention. For example - A, B, & C had the same or similar intention to kill D. They,all reached the house of D incidentally at the same time. There is no meeting of minds and hence their intention is same or similar and not common. To constitute common intention it is necessary,that the, intention of each be known to all the others and be shared by them whereas common object does not require a prior concert and a common meeting of minds. It is enough if each has the same object in view.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses