send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The case of Pakala Narain Swamy v. Emperor relates to:
Doctrine of Estoppel
Dying Declaration
Cross Examination
Accomplice
According to Section 65A of the Indian Evidence Act - The contents of electronic records may be proved in accordance with the provisions of Section 65B. 26. The case of Pakala Narain Swamy v. Emperor relates to: a. Doctrine of Estoppel b. Dying Declaration C. Cross Examination d.• Accomplice Ans: (b) - One of the issues in the case was the validity of dying declaration. It was held that under the Indian Evidence Act, it is not necessary that the declarant should be under any expectation of death. If the declarant has in fact died and the statement explains the circumstances surrounding his death, the statement will be relevant even if no cause of death had arisen at the time of making the statement.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses