send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Which statement is true in relation to a child witness?
A child of tender age can be allowed to testify if he has intellectual capacity understand questions and give rational answers thereto,
A child witness may be easy prey of tutorial and when it is established that he is under the mfluence of tutoring it is not safe to solely rely on his evidence
The law recogmzes the child as a competent witness but a child of a tender age of six years is not considered by the Court to be a witness whose testimony can be relied without other corroborative evidence
All the above statements are true
a witness is supposed to state the fect on Oath therw is no precise and fixed rule as to the time within which infants are excluded from giving evidence but their admissibility depends upon the sense and reason they entertain of the danger and impiety to falsehood, which is to be collected from their answers to the questions propounded to them by the courts. but if they are found incompetent to take an oath, their testimony cannot be recived. According to SC adequate corroboration of his testimony must be looked from other evidence. A child of 6years, who become the victim of rape immediately told of thisfact to her mother. the statement to the mother was used as corroborative evidence to the testimony of the child which was otherwise also found to be natural and credible. The evidence of a child is not to be discarded per se. Where the child is found to be competent and his evidence reliable, it can be acted upon..
By: santosh ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses