send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Where a person challenges the validity of a judgment decree or order on the basis of fraud misrepresentation or want of jurisdiction he shall seeks his remady by making an
Appeal
Application
Revision
None of the above
- If a person questions the validity of a judgment, decree, or order due to fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of jurisdiction, the proper remedy is to file an application to set aside such judgment or order.
- An appeal is used to challenge the correctness of a judgment on merits, not when issues like fraud or lack of jurisdiction are in question.
- A revision is generally used to correct jurisdictional errors or serious legal mistakes but not typically for fraud or misrepresentation affecting the judgment's validity.
- So, the specific legal process is usually through an application (Option 2), often filed under relevant provisions (like Order 9 Rule 13 CPC or Section 151 CPC).
- None of the above would obviously not apply as application is correct.
Option 2: Application is the correct answer.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses