send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Akanksha is accused of disobeying a direction of the law with an intent to save Sonam from punishment. As per Section 213 Cr. P.C.
the charge must set out the disobedience charged
the charge must set out the law infringed
both (A) and (B)
none of them
- Section 213 of the Cr.P.C. deals with the content of a charge when a person is accused of disobeying the law.
- It says that the charge must clearly state the specific act of disobedience (what was done or not done).
- It must also set out which law, rule, or regulation has been infringed (the legal provision that was violated).
- This makes sure the accused knows both what action is being questioned and under what legal authority.
- Option 1 is about mentioning the disobedience.
- Option 2 is about mentioning the law infringed.
- Option 3 combines both, which is what Section 213 requires.
- Option 4 (none) is incorrect.
Option 3: both (A) and (B) is correct.
By: Raj Samyal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses