send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
An unjustified and unexplained long delay on the part of the investigating officer in recording the statement of a material witness would render the evidence of such witness:
unreliable
inadmissible
inadmissible and unreliable
only (b) and not (a).
- Option 1: Unreliable
- If there's an unjustified delay in recording a witness's statement, the reliability of their evidence could be questioned.
- Memory and details fade over time, which can affect the witness's accuracy.
- Option 2: Inadmissible
- "Inadmissible" refers to evidence not allowed in court.
- Delays in recording a statement alone might not make evidence inadmissible unless other factors affect legality.
- Option 3: Inadmissible and Unreliable
- A combination of both issues: evidence is neither credible nor legally permissible.
- Less likely as delays mainly affect reliability, not admissibility.
- Option 4: Only (b) and not (a)
- Suggests evidence is inadmissible but not unreliable.
- Doesn't consider the impact of delay on credibility.
Answer: Option 1 - Unreliable
By: Raj Samyal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses