send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cognizance can be taken of –
I Offence
II. Accused
III.Witnesses
IV. Offenders
Only I
I and III
I and II
I and IV
Let's go through the statements and options:
- I. Offence
- The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) empowers courts to take "cognizance of an offence," not individuals. This means the court recognizes that a particular offence has been committed and decides to proceed with judicial processes.
- II. Accused
- Courts do not take cognizance of the accused person but of the crime/offence.
- III. Witnesses
- Cognizance is never about the witnesses; they are only relevant during the trial as supporting evidence.
- IV. Offenders
- The term "offender" refers to the person who committed the crime, but cognizance under CrPC is strictly about the offence itself, not the person.
Correct Option:
Option 1: Only I
- Courts take cognizance only of offences, not individuals.
By: Raj Samyal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses