send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
An agreement enforceable by law at the instance of one party & not of other party under section 2(i) is called
A valid contract
An illegal contract
A void contract
A voidable contract
An agreement is Voidable when an agreement or contract is enforceable at the • option of one Or more of the other parties thereto but not at the option of the other or others. For example: The contract was entered under duress, coercion, undue influence or fraud. A consent given under duress is no consent and the person giving such consent has the option to withdrawit. A contract the consent to which is caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the party whose consent is so caused. Burden is on the. party alleging fraud to establish (Hajra Bai V. Jadavabai All? 1986 MF106) .A person avoiding the contract on the basis of being voidable has to disclose in his plaint the full partk'ulàrs of any of the vitiating factors entitling him to avoid the contract fGSubhashini v. PLakthini.Bai '1579 1MLJ1071 In a voidable contract, vague and general allegations are insufficient. The vitiating factors must be separately pleaded with specificity, particularity and precision (Bishu.ndeo Narain v Seogeni ..RJA1R 1951 SC 280)
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses