Explanation:

In Berubari Union and Exchange. of Enclaves - the Sc held that preamble is the key to open the minds of the framers of the Constitution. In this case it was hld by the, apex court that Preamble is not a part of the constItution. In Golak Nath v state of Punjab, the sc observed that 'the Preamble contains in nutshell, its ideals and aspirations." In Kesavanand Bharti v. State of Kerala, the sc rejected the view that preamble is not a part of the constitution. It was held that "the preamble of our constitution, is of extreme importance and the constitution should be read and interpreted in the light of the grand and noble vision expressed in the preamble. Preamble serves the following purposes:

i) It refers to the source of constitution

(ii) it embodies the enacting clause which brings in to force the constitution ciii? It declares the fundamental rights and freedom which the people of India intended to secure. It also indicates the basic type of pqlityandgovtt which is to be 'established.

(iv)The preamble is an epitome of broad elements of Indian constitution (Epitome: perfect example of something)

(v)The scope of the significant chapter of directive principles and the fundamental rights could only be understood in the light of the objectives enshrined in the Preamble. (Bharti Chandra vState of Mysore,)

(vi) The preamble of our constitution is very much enacted and adopted in the same manner as the other enactixg provisions. Thus the preamble of the constitution occupies the same position as other enacting words or provisions of the constitution.