send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
The rule that once the terms of any contract have been proved by documentary evidence, no evidence of any oral statement shall be admitted for contradicting such terms has_ provisos establishing variations to the. rule.
6
4
3
7
The question is based on section 96 - wheA: the langnage used in a document is on its face, ambiguous or defective, evidence may not be given of facts which would show its meaning or supply its defects. Section 93 has six pro visos: L fact' which itself questions the validity of contract 2. existence of separate oral agreement on which law is silent and which is not inconsistent with its terms. 3. the existence of any separate oral agreement constituting 'a condition precedent. 4. the existence of any distinct subsequent oral agreement to rescind ormodify such contract.. 5 any usage or custom by which incidents not expressly mentioned in any contract. 6 any fact that maybe proved which shows in what manner the language of a document is related to existing facts.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses