send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
That a petition dismissed under Article 226 would operate as res judicata so as to bar a similar petition Mi. the 'Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution was hid in the case of;
Daryao v, State of U.P,
Arjun Singh v, State of M.P.
Sudhir Chandra v, State of W.B,
None of the above
In Dazyao v State of V7 the 'Supreme court has placed the . doctrine of res judicata on a still broader foundation. "The binding character of judgments pronounced by courts of competent jurisdiction is itself an 'essential part of the rule Of law and the rule obviously is the basis of the administration of justice which the Constitution lays so much emphasis.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses