Explanation:

According to Section 6 of the Act (Hindu Succession Act) when a coparcener dies leaving behind any female relative specified in Class I of the Schedule to the Act or male relative, specified in that class claiming through such female relative, his undivided interest in the Mitakshara coparcenary property . would not devolve upon the surviving coparcener, by survivorship but upon his .heirs by intestate succession. Explanation 1 to Section 6 of the Act provides . a mechanism under which undivided interest of a deceased coparcener can be ascertained and, i.e.; that the interest of a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to be the share in the property that would have been allotted to him if a partition of the property had taken place immediately before his death, irrespective of whether he was entitled to daim partition or not It means for the purposes of finding out undivided interest of a deceased coparcener, a notional partition has to be assumed immediately before his death and the same shall devolve upon his heirs by succession which would obviously include the surviving coparcener who, apart from the devolution of the undivided interest of the deceased upon him by succession, would also be entitled to claim his undivided interest in the coparcenary property which he could have got in notional partition. {Anar Devi & Ors v.  Parameshwari Devi and Ors AIR 2008 SC 3332).