In pursuit of earning quick money, A and B agreed to ‘kidnap children from reputed public schools, whose parents are capable of paying ransom. A wrote a letter to B asking him to be present on 1.1.2011 at 12.30 P.M. at the gates of a public school in Chandigarh. A waited for B at the agreed spot and during this period gave a message through his mobile phone to B, asking him to get some Chloroform to facilitate the execution of work (kidnapping). Police working on a tip arrested B before he could meet A. B in police custody agreed to have chalked out a plan for the purposes of kidnapping.

In the charge for conspiracy to kidnap, prosecution produces following evidence:-

(i) Letter written by A to B

(ii) Mobile phone message of A to B

(iii) Statement of B, after arrest.

Give your opinion about relevancy and admissibility of above evidence with relevant provisions of law and decided cases.     (20 Marks)