send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Under section 45 of Evidence Act the opinion of expent can be on the question of:
Indian law
Foreign law
Both A and B
None of the above
Here’s the thing: section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act is about when courts need expert opinions. Let’s break down what kind of questions experts can pitch in on:
- *Indian law*: Actually, experts aren’t called to give opinions on Indian law in court. Judges are expected to know Indian law themselves, so expert testimony isn’t needed here.
- *Foreign law*: Different story. Courts sometimes need an expert’s help to understand foreign law. It’s not assumed that judges already know these systems, so expert opinions are admissible.
- *Both A and B*: Nope, because Indian law isn’t included.
- *None of the above*: Not right—foreign law is covered.
? Option 2—Foreign law is correct.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses