In which case the Supreme Court held that where the parties set up competing titles and the differen...........

Registeration Act 1908 General Registry

In which case the Supreme Court held that where the parties set-up competing titles and the differences are resolved by a compromise, there is no question of one deriving title from the other and so the document is not compulsorily registrable

Roshan Singh v. Zile Singh

Ghulam Ahmad v. Ghulam Qadir

Bakhtawar Singh v. Gurdev Singh

S.V. Chandra pandian v. S.V. Sivalinga Nadar

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master General Registry

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

- Roshan Singh v. Zile Singh: In this case, the Supreme Court decided that when parties claim competing titles and resolve their differences through a compromise, the resulting document does not necessitate compulsory registration because the title is not derived from one party to the other.

- Ghulam Ahmad v. Ghulam Qadir: A relevant case, but it doesn't deal with registration related to the compromise of competing titles.

- Bakhtawar Singh v. Gurdev Singh: Addresses different legal issues unrelated to the registration of titles through compromise.

- S.V. Chandra Pandian v. S.V. Sivalinga Nadar: Discusses joint family properties and related legal disputes, not specifically about registration in compromise situations.

The correct answer is:

- Roshan Singh v. Zile Singh