In which case the Supreme Court of India held that polygraph test Conducted under compulsion is viol...........

Constitutional Law Articles, Schedules and Amendment

In which case the Supreme Court of India held that polygraph test Conducted under compulsion is violative of article 20(3) of the Constitution

Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010)

Aruna R. Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011)

Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab (1965)

M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954)

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Articles, Schedules and Amendment

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

- Option 1: Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010)

- This case held that conducting a polygraph test under compulsion is a violation of Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. The court ruled against involuntary polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain-mapping tests, protecting the accused against self-incrimination.

- Option 2: Aruna R. Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011)

- This case dealt with the issue of euthanasia and the right to die with dignity. It is unrelated to polygraph tests or Article 20(3).

- Option 3: Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab (1965)

- This case is related to criminal law but does not focus on polygraph tests or Article 20(3).

- Option 4: M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954)

- This case interpreted the right against self-incrimination but is not specific to polygraph tests.