send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
“Marriages of all persons who are citizens of India belonging to various religions should be made compulsorily registrable in their respective states where the marriage is solemnized.” This was held by Supreme Court in the case of
Seema v. Ashwani Kumar
Geta jagdish Mangtani v. jagdish mangtani
Durga prasanna Tripathy v. Arundhaty Tripathy
Ramesh Chand Daga v. Rameshwari Bai
- In Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, the Supreme Court held that marriages of Indian citizens belonging to various religions must be registered in the respective state where the marriage is solemnized. This mandatory registration aimed to protect rights and prevent fraud.
- Geta Jagdish Mangtani v. Jagdish Mangtani involved a family dispute and did not focus on marriage registration laws.
- Durga Prasanna Tripathy v. Arundhati Tripathy centered on divorce and alimony issues, not on marriage registration.
- Ramesh Chand Daga v. Rameshwari Bai dealt with the complexities of marriage validity and maintenance laws, without addressing mandatory registration.
By: Abhipedia ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses