send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Give the correct response: Statement I : Under Article 16(3) state can depart from the principle stated, prohibition of discrimination on the basis of residence
Statement II : State can deviate in matters of employment on private or under the state
Statement I is correct only
Statement II is correct only
Both statements are correct
Both statements are incorrect
The Indian Parliament, through the powers under Article 16(3) of the Constitution, enacted the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act which sought to abolish every existing residence requirement from States for public appointments.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses