send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Parliament passed an Act provided for the trial of offences of bribery and corruption by the special court and provided for all pending trials to such judges. Act was challenged.
Act is not violative of Article 14 as there is intelligible differentiation related with the object sought to be achieved-suppression of bribery and corruption.
First part which provided for the trial of such offences by special judges is valid. But transferring of pending suits to special judges is invalid
Both (a) and (b) are incorrect
Both (a) and (b) are correct
Article 14 of the Constitution of India provides for equality before the law or equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. It states: "The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India."
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses