A law which takes away the rights conferred by this part would be valid in respect of citizens ...........

Constitutional Law Preamble and Citizenship

A law which takes away the rights conferred by this part would be valid in respect of citizens only and would not be valid respect of non-citizens was held in

State of Gujarat Vs. Ambika mills

R.M.D.C. Vs Union of India

Moho Isaq Vs. State of UP

None of these

छोटे Courses बड़े Results

Master Preamble and Citizenship

Prepare through Micro-courses

Try Now

Explanation:

State of Gujarat Vs. Ambika mills

The present case deals with the application of the fundamental rights of the Constitution of India. Indians were guaranteed with fundamental rights by the Constitution of India but there was a question on whether the non-citizens are entitled to enjoy these rights. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the non-citizens are not having the fundamental rights and therefore they are not allowed to take advantage of the voidness of the law which is inconsistent with Part III of the Constitution. Therefore, the Apex Court again confirmed that the existing laws are applicable to non-citizens and no law can be held void in rem or for all purposes.