send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Cell phone users have found that tariff plans are not as attractive as promoted by telecom companies and complained to regulatory authority about the same.
Courses of action:
I. The regulatory authority should direct telecom companies to be trasparent on the tariff structure of all plans
II. The government should restrict the number of telecom companies operating in the country.
If only course of action I follows
If only course of action II follows
If either course of action I or II follows
If both courses of action I and II follow
Being " not as attractive as promoted " is a clear case of hiding things.
Hence " transparency " is the answer to the problem and I folloes.
II goes against the spirit of free market and is not relevant to the problem either.
Hence, option 1 is the correct answer.
By: Amit Kumar ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses