The above-mentioned properties also hold for strict inequalities.

Now let’s move forward to our topic of interest. Consider the following question,

A α B means A is greater than B

A β B means A is either greater than or equal to B

A γ B means A is equal to B

A δ B means A is small than B.

A η B means A is either smaller than or equal to B

Now on the basis of the statement given below be true, find which of the following conclusion holds to be true?

Statement: E γ F, C δ D, F β G, D α E

Conclusion 1: E α G

Conclusion 2: C γ E

• If only conclusion 1 holds
• If only conclusion 2 holds
• If either 1 or 2 is true
• If neither 1 nor 2 is true
• If both 1 and 2 are true.

If you carefully examine the above question you can find out that symbols are used to represent various inequalities and with the support of these inequalities conclusions are framed which defines a relationship between two variable and you have to judge whether these relationships are true or False. In summary, you have to decode the above coded inequalities and determine their validity. These kinds of questions come in various competitive exams such as Bank PO, SSC, CAT etc. These questions can prove to be effortless and simple to solve if you now the right technique and methods to do so otherwise, they can be perplexing and time-consuming. In this blog, I will provide you straightforward and direct methods and steps on how to approach these types of problems and solve them rapidly.

Step 1: Accurately decipher: You should make sure you correctly and carefully write the meaning of the code either along with it or can make a separate table for it. To avoid mistakes, make sure that you take one code at a time and replace it with it’s original meaning everywhere then move on to the next one. For example, E γ F means E is equal to F. Thus, replace γ with = everywhere in the statement and conclusions wherever the code exists.

Step 2: Relevancy of statements for assessing the conclusion: In this step, what needs to be done is that we pick one conclusion and then judge which statements are admissible for evaluating the conclusion. And admissible statement implies that the statement is not incompetent for deriving the particular conclusion. To check that for example, if there’s a conclusion a

E γ F, F β G

Hence above statements are “relevant statements” for the given conclusion.

Step 3: Combine the relevant statements and develop the conclusion from it.

Now, how to combine the statements?  There are 3 golden rules to do so.

Rule 1: There must be a common term which is present in the above example i.e. F

Rule 2: The common term must be less than (or equal) to one term and greater than (or equal to) the other term.

Note 1: You can check this instantly be following the visual rule. If the common greater than (or equal to) one term and less than (or equal to) another term; then the pointed side of the ‘>’ sign will be towards the common term in one case and away from it in the other. So, the combination is possible in such cases only. In all other cases, the pointed sign will be either towards the common term or away from it in both the cases

Rule 3: The conclusion inequality is obtained by letting the common term disappear and it has a ‘≥’ or ‘≤’ sign if and only if both inequalities in the second step had a ‘≥’ or a ‘≤’ sign. In all other cases, there will be a ‘>’ or ‘<’ sign in the conclusion.

When you are done with all these above steps and the conclusion is established and verified; well and good. If not, then follow these additional checks.

Check 1: Examine if the given conclusion directly follows from any one single statement.

Check 2:  Analyze if the conclusion inequality you reach is essentially the same as the given conclusion but written differently.

Check 3: If your derived conclusion (or given a statement) is of type A ≥ B (or A ≤ B) then check if the two conclusions are A > B or A = B (or, A < B and A = B). If yes, choice “either follows” is true.

Check 4: If neither of the conclusion has been proved correct till now, check if the given conclusions form a complementary pair. They form a complementary pair in the following 4 cases.

• A ≥ B and A
• A > B and A ≤ B
• A ≤ B and A > B
• A < B and A ≥ B

 Note 2: Check 3 and check 4 are required only if both conclusions have the same pair of terms.

 Note 3: Two terms can never be equal if in the original statements these two terms won’t appear in separate equalities. It means that P = Q may hold only if there are two statements such as P = R. Q = S present in the problem. Otherwise, if no such statement is there in the question then it is definitely false.

Therefore, with the help of above steps, we can straightaway solve the problem quoted earlier.

Step 1:  E = F, C < D, F ≥ G, D > E

Conclusion 1: E > G

Conclusion 2: C = E

Step 2: We take conclusion 1 and as stated earlier F is the common term between E and G. And their relationship is as follows: E = F, F ≥ G

Step 3: Combining the above two statements by using the three golden rules we get, E = F ≥ G i.e.  E ≥ G which doesn’t satisfy the given conclusion. Thus, conclusion 1 doesn’t hold.

Let’s perform both these two steps for conclusion 2.

Step 2: Relevant statements for conclusion 2 are C < D and D > E.

Step 3: We cannot combine inequalities here as D is greater than both C and E. Check 3 and 4 are futile here because of Note 2. Also, check 1 and check 2 cannot prove anything concrete and doesn’t bring any solution. Thus, conclusion 2 is also invalid.

Therefore, the correct answer to the question is neither of the conclusion is true. I believe the above method would make solving similar questions easily and smoothly. Though, you will get more clarity on how to use the above checks precisely with time and practice.