send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In the question below, one or two statements is given followed by two conclusions/assumptions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can be drawn from the given statement. Statements:
The crop condition continues to be critical even after the rains.
Conclusions:
I. The crop condition was not critical before the rains.
II. The crop condition was expected to improve after the rains.
Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Both conclusions I and II follow.
Only conclusion II follows.
Only conclusion I follows.
I. The crop condition was not critical before the rains. => The statement tells us that the crop condition ‘continues’ to be critical after the rains. This tells us that it was critical even before the rains. Thus this conclusion does not follow.
II. The crop condition was expected to improve after the rains. => The fact that a report had to be made about the crop condition after the rains implies that a change was expected. That the statement reported no change in the condition despite the rains. This tells us that the rain was expected to improve the condition of the crops. Thus this conclusion follows.
By: ASRAF UDDIN AHMED ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses