send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Statement: Beware of dogs. Our dogs do not bark but they are trained to distinguish between a genuine guest and intruders.
Assumption I: Barking dogs rarely bite.
Assumption II: Our dogs could be dangerous for intruders.
Which of the following can be validity inferred from the above statement?
Only assumption I.
Only assumption II.
Either assumption I or assumption II.
Neither assumption I nor assumption II
The statement clearly warns the visitors to beware of dogs as they are trained to welcome the guests and intruders differently.
So, II is implicit. I is vague and hence, it is not implicit.
Hence, option 2 is the correct answer.
By: Amit Kumar ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses