send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Conclusions: I. P > B II. P = B
Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows. Option 4, is hence the correct answer. Common explanation: There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order. If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we have to say that it does not follow. Priority Order: 1. > and < 2. ≥ and ≤ 3. = For conclusion I: P > B Combining statements I and II: B ≤ X ≤ P So, P > B, does not follow. For conclusion II: P = B Combining statements I and II: B ≤ X ≤ P So, P = B, does not follow. Now, we can see that: Both the objects of conclusions I and II are same i.e. ‘P’ and ‘B’. Both the conclusions I and II are wrong. On combining both the relations we get the actual relation i.e. P ≥ B So, Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
By: Amit Kumar ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses