Explanation:

Option 1: Suchitra Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration

- This is the case you’re looking for. The Supreme Court clearly upheld the right of reproductive choice, including for a mentally retarded rape survivor. The Court said her right to continue or terminate a pregnancy must be respected, emphasizing bodily autonomy.

- Decision: 2009, it’s widely cited on women’s reproductive rights.

Option 2: Sampurna Behra

- This case is about juvenile justice, not reproductive rights. It deals with child protection and welfare laws—completely different topic.

Option 3: Nipun Saxena

- This case is about guidelines for the media and legal system on protecting the privacy of rape victims. Again, not directly about the reproductive choice or abortion rights.

Option 4: None of the above

- That would be wrong, because option 1 is correct.

Correct answer: Option 1—Suchitra Srivastava