Which Judgment has held that it is duty of the Court in matrimonial cases to act as a settlor amp no...........

Miscellaneous Others

Which Judgment has held that it is duty of the Court in matrimonial cases to act as a settlor & not as an adversarial judge?

Bheemraya Vs. Suneetha 2013, Supreme Court

G. V. Rav Vs. LHV Prased 2000, Supreme Court

Both a and b

None of the above

Explanation:

- Option 1: Bheemraya Vs. Suneetha 2013, Supreme Court - This case emphasizes a sensitive approach by the court in matrimonial matters. However, it does not alone establish the duty of the court to act as a settlor rather than as an adversarial judge.

- Option 2: G. V. Rav Vs. LHV Prased 2000, Supreme Court - This case also discusses the role of the court in matrimonial disputes, focusing on reconciliation efforts.

- Option 3: Both a and b - It is the combination of these rulings that underlines the responsibility of courts in matrimonial cases to seek settlements rather than purely adversarial outcomes.

- Option 4: None of the above - Incorrect, as the above cases do address the court's role in matrimonial matters.