send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court has made following observation regarding profession of law and its real purpose “ lawyers must realise that law is not a pleasent retreat, where concern is merely with mechanical interpretation of rules made by the legislature but it is a teeming open ended avenue through which most of the traffic of human existence passes?
Sheela Barse Vs. State of Maharashtra 1983, Supreme Court
Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
Olga Tellis & Ors. Vs. Bombay Muncipal corporation, 1985 Supreme Court.
SP Gupta Vs. Union of India, 1981, Supreme Court
- The observation about the legal profession being more than mere mechanical interpretation but rather a vital avenue for human existence actually comes from Olga Tellis & Ors. Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 Supreme Court.
- In Olga Tellis, the Supreme Court addressed the role of law and lawyers in relation to the rights of pavement dwellers and emphasized the broader purpose of law as a tool for justice.
- Sheela Barse Vs. State of Maharashtra (1983) dealt primarily with the rights of prisoners and guidelines for legal aid but did not include the quoted observation.
- Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar focused on the right to speedy trial for undertrial prisoners.
- SP Gupta Vs. Union of India (1981) was about judicial appointments, independence of judiciary, not the profession of law's broad purpose.
Correct answer is Option 3: Olga Tellis & Ors. Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 Supreme Court.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses