send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which case, the letter written by a Journalist narrating incidents of custodian violence against women prisoners in a Bombay Police lock up was admitted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as a writ petition?
Sheela Barse Vs. State of Maharashtra 1983, Supreme Court
Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
Olga Tellis & Ors. Vs. Bombay Muncipal corporation, 1985 Supreme Court.
SP Gupta Vs. Union of India, 1981, Supreme Court
- Option 1: Sheela Barse Vs. State of Maharashtra 1983, Supreme Court
- The correct option. A letter by a journalist, Sheela Barse, highlighting custodial violence against women in a Bombay Police lock-up was accepted as a writ petition.
- This case led to significant legal developments concerning the rights of prisoners.
- Option 2: Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
- A landmark case dealing with the rights of undertrial prisoners in Bihar and ensuring timely justice.
- Option 3: Olga Tellis & Ors. Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 Supreme Court
- About the rights of pavement dwellers and slum dwellers, it dealt with issues around eviction and the right to livelihood.
- Option 4: SP Gupta Vs. Union of India, 1981, Supreme Court
- Known for discussing judicial appointments and the independence of the judiciary.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses