send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In which Land-mark judgment the Hon’ble Supreme Court has invoked Article 39 A of the Constitution of India to engage a lawyer and to secure legal services to poor accused?
Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration 1979, Supreme Court
Keshva Nandan Bharti Vs. State of Kerala
Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Sh. Raj Narayan
- Option 1: Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
The Supreme Court recognized the right to free legal aid under Article 39A, emphasizing legal services for the poor.
Correct Answer.
- Option 2: Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration 1979, Supreme Court
This case focused on prison reforms and the rights of prisoners but didn't specifically invoke Article 39A.
- Option 3: Keshva Nandan Bharti Vs. State of Kerala
Known for the basic structure doctrine, this case didn't involve Article 39A regarding legal aid.
- Option 4: Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Sh. Raj Narayan
Related to election laws and constitutional amendments, not about legal aid under Article 39A.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses