send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: A person is said to have committed assault when an apprehension is caused in the mind of a person that he is about to use ph ysical force against his body.
Facts: 'A' abuses 'B' while he was sitting in a moving train, by aggressively shaking his fists when 'B' was standing on the railway platform at a distance.
'A' has caused apprehension of assault in the mind of 'B'.
'A' has committed assault against 'B'.
'A' has not committed assault against 'B'.
'A' has caused fear of assault in the mind of 'B'.
As per the given factual situation, the conduct of A cannot be termed as an assault on B. The facts state clearly that A and B were at a distance from each other. Also B was sitting in a moving train and A was standing on the platform. Hence the ability of A to use physical force on B is considerably low. 'A' has not committed assault against 'B'.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses