send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: A contract would be invalid and unlawful, if the contract is for an immoral or illegal purpose.
Facts: P, was a young and helpless widow, living on the pavement. R, a neighbour gave her a house, registered in her name, on the condition that she should allow R to keep his smuggled goods and drugs in her house. After the registration was done, according to the condition in the contract, R’s agents went to keep some packets in her house, she refused. R told her the condition under which the house was given to her. She still refused. Is P justified in her action?
P is not justified as she did not have the right to deny R’s request.
As R was making the contract for illegal activities, P’s stand is valid in law.
R can take back the house by cancelling the transfer deed.
P is right as she did not like smuggled goods to be kept in her house.
The very point of giving her a favour of having a house in her name would give her a security but an obligation as well that P has to co-operate with R for smuggling of illegal materials and she could not even refuse for the nature of their relationship. But as mentioned clearly in the contract that transferring of illegal material will make the contract invalid or void which gave her a triumph in this situation. As R was making the contract for illegal activities, P’s stand is valid in law.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses