send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: When an act which would otherwise be a certain offence. is not that offence. By reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding. the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act. or by reason of any misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence.
Facts: ‘X’ under the influence of madness, attempts to kill ‘Y’.
‘Y’ has the right of private defence against ‘X’
‘Y’ does not have the right of private defence against ‘X’
‘Y’ has the right of private defence against ‘X’ only if ‘X’ is not under the influence of madness
‘X’ has the right of private defence against ‘Y’
Since X was insane his actions would not amount to an offence, still Y would get a chance to defend himself according to principle. Hence, option 1 is the correct answer.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses