send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.
Facts: Roshan along with two of his friends, Tushar and Tarang proceeded to the house of Darshan in order to avenge an insult made by the brother of Darshan. They opened fire on the members of Darshan’s family. It was found that the shots of Roshan did not hit anyone. but the shots of Tushar and Tarang succeeded in killing Darshan.
Roshan was not liable for the offence of murder of Darshan. as Roshan’s shots did not hit Darshan
Only Tushar and Tarang were liable for the offence of murder of Darshan. as their shots hit Darshan
Roshan along with Tushar and Tarang was liable for the offence of murder of Darshan
Roshan was liable to a lesser extent comparing to his fiiends for the offence of murder of Darshan. as Roshan?s shots did not hit Darshan
In this case all the three proceeded to Darshan’s house with a common intention. Thus, the first requirement of the principle is met. Thereafter all of them proceeded to fire including Roshan, thus becoming party to the criminal act. Therefore as per the principle Roshan is equally guilty irrespective of the fact whether his bullet hit the victim or not.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses