send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced. An agreement to which the consent of the promisor is freely given is not void merely because the consideration is inadequate; but the inadequacy of the consideration may be taken into account by the Court in determining the question whether the consent of the promisor was freely given.
Facts: ‘A’ agrees to sell his mobile phone worth t 20,000/- for 100/- only to ‘B’. A’s consent is freely given.
Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?
There is a contract between ‘A’ and ‘B’
There is no contract between ‘A’ and ‘B’ because consideration is not adequate
There is no contract between ‘A’ and ‘B’ because a mobile phone worth 20,000/- cannot be sold for just 100/-
None of the above.
As per the principle the adequacy of consideration is irrelevant, so long as it is legal, valid and specified freely by the parties. In the facts given there is nothing to indicate that Adid not give his consent freely, thus the contract will be a valid one.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses