send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: When an offer is accepted by a person to whom it is made, it becomes a promise. But this promise will become legally binding only when the acceptance of the offer is unconditional.
Facts: Ram makes an offer to sell his house to Shyam for Rs.50 lacs. Shyam accepts this offer but wants to pay the price of the house in five quarterly instalments. Ram does not agree to it. Thereafter Shyam agrees to pay the price of the house in the way as originally desired by Ram. But Ram does not reply to it. Can Shyam compel Ram to sell his house to him?
Shyam can compel Ram to sell his house because Shyam ultimately agrees to pay the price as originally desired by Ram.
Shyam can compel Ram to sell his house because Shyam in the first instance substantially complied with the desire of Ram
Shyam can compel Ram to sell his house because Ram’s offer does not exclude the payment of price in instalments
Shyam can not compel Ram to sell his house because Shyam imposes a new condition about payment of price of the house while accepting the offer which is not ultimately accepted by Ram.
As per the principle, a promise is legally binding only when acceptance is unconditional. Shyam's acceptance was accompanied by another condition which amounts to counter offer. Hence, Shyam cannot compel Ram to sell his house. An offer must be accepted in the currency of the offer. When the original offer was made the condition of payment by Shyam, it amounted to a counter offer not an acceptance. Since the original offer was replaced by a counter offer, it came to an end and Shyam cannot insist on the acceptance of an offer which has come to an end.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses