send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Principle: Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsound state of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or something that he is doing is either wrong or contrary to law.
Fact: X takes his son Y who is three years old, for bathing to the well. He throws his son inside the well so that the son can have a good bath. After 10 minutes he also jumps into the well to take bath and get his son out of the well. Both were rescued by the villagers but his son was found dead.
X has committed culpable homicide amounting to murder
X has committed murder
X has done no offence as he can plead the defense of unsound state of mind
X’s family should be held responsible for allowing him to take the child to the well
Basically all options are incorrect. The correct answer should be "X has committed culpable homicide NOT amounting tomurder". Besides, there is nothing in the facts to show that X has committed the act in unsound state of mind. But, we have to choose one option from the given above, so we considered In this case the baby was thrown not with the intention to kill him Further he jumped himself which clearly indicates there was no intention to kill. Hence, option 3 is the correct answer.
By: SANAT DATT BHARDWAJ ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses